You must be a registered user to access our website. Please complete the registration form at no cost, or login if you are already a registered user. Be assured, your registration information is secure and will not be sold or made available to others.
To learn why registration is now required, see this editorial on the website changes. Once you have completed the registration process, to include verification of your email address, a cookie will be placed on your computer to automatically complete the login process in the future.
Registered users, click here.
New users or if you have never registered before, click here.
|2/1/2013||Point of View: Boy Scouts should not change their policy on homosexuality|
|8/8/2012||Point of View: Strong base of missions at home needed to do more overseas|
|2/23/2012||Point of View: The Cuban Missile Crisis and Iran’s threat to Israel|
|4/28/2010||Point of View: A 15 percent challenge to benefit Florida Baptist Children’s Homes|
|View All Articles by DARIN L. KRESS|
Subscribe to DARIN L. KRESS's RSS Feed
While the Boy Scout handbook has always been non-sectarian, it also has always presented a belief in God as a requirement for good scouts. The Scout Oath requires that scouts be “morally straight,” and the Scout Law requires that a scout be “clean and reverent.” The meaning of these terms has recently collided with America’s changing morality.
In 1989, James Dale applied to be an assistant scoutmaster in the Boy Scouts, Troop 73 in New Jersey. In 1990, Dale’s photograph appeared in the local newspaper as the co-president of the Lesbian/Gay Alliance. Dale soon received a letter from the Boy Scouts informing him that his adult membership was being revoked in the BSA because the Scouts “specifically forbid membership to homosexuals.”
Dale filed suit alleging that the BSA had violated New Jersey’s accommodations statute and the Scouts needed to reinstate his membership. When lower courts sided with Dale, the Boy Scouts appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled in favor of the BSA. Writing the majority opinion of the 5-4 ruling in 2000, Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote:
The Boy Scouts asserts that homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the values embodied in the Scout Oath and Law, particularly those represented by the terms “morally straight” and “clean,” and that the organization does not want to promote homosexual conduct as a legitimate form of behavior. The Court gives deference to the Boy Scouts’ assertions regarding the nature of its Expression. … The state interests embodied in New Jersey’s public accommodations law do not justify such a severe intrusion on the freedom of expressive association.
Because of social pressure, the Boy Scouts of America is now considering ending their longstanding ban on gay members and scoutmasters in order to allow local organizations to decide their own policy. Conceding this high court victory for private organizations that have moral requirements for membership because of social pressure could have potential ramifications for churches. Changing the BSA policy would also require a redefining or a removal of the terms, “morally straight, clean” and “reverent.”
Chief Justice Rehnquist was right. The BSA should not be pressured to change its policy to “promote homosexual conduct as a legitimate form of behavior.” That behavior is incompatible with applied Christianity and the intent of the Boy Scouts’ founders.
Darin Kress is pastor of Scott Lake Baptist Church in Lakeland.
You must be login before you can leave a comment. Click here to Register if you are a new user.