Obama re-election campaign embraces gay ‘marriage’ and mocks Romney stance
May 23, 2012
By STAFF

Related Coverage:

Election 2012

WASHINGTON (BP)—President Obama’s re-election campaign has fully embraced his public support of gay “marriage” and seems poised to make it a general election issue—even to the point of ridiculing Mitt Romney’s backing of traditional marriage.

Hours after Obama became the first sitting U.S. president to declare public support for the issue, his campaign sent out an email to supporters with the subject line “Marriage.” 

“I believe that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry,” Obama said in the email. “... What I’ve come to realize is that for loving, same-sex couples, the denial of marriage equality means that, in their eyes and the eyes of their children, they are still considered less than full citizens.”

The email concluded, “If you agree, you can stand up with me here”—and a link to donate money was provided. 

The Democratic National Committee also sent out an email from chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, embracing the issue.

“Folks, this is what Democrats are all about—and I’m so proud we have a president who’s willing to stand up and say it,” she wrote. “Let’s join him. Show your support for marriage equality today.”

The issue of gay “marriage” was the dominant theme May 10 at BarackObama.com—Obama’s campaign website—where visitors encountered a large picture of Obama with the words, “same-sex couples should be able to get married.” The campaign also sent out multiple Tweets and Facebook messages spreading the president’s position.

But perhaps the biggest embrace of the issue came in an Internet video where the campaign re-played Obama’s statement and Romney’s previous statements, and even twisted President Bush’s words on civil unions—all in about 90 seconds.

The Obama re-election video ends with a clip of GOP presumptive nominee Romney at a Republican debate. Romney says, “Calling [a gay relationship] a marriage creates a whole host of problems for families, for the law, for the practice of religion, for education. Let me say this, 3,000 years of human history shouldn’t be discarded so quickly.” The video then ends with words on the screen: “President Obama is Moving us Forward.” The implication: Romney is backwards. In fact, that’s the name the campaign gave the video: “Mitt Romney: Backwards on Equality.”

Ironically, Romney’s statement received significant applause at the debate and agreement among social conservatives. His “religion” comment was referencing court-ordered gay “marriage” in his home state of Massachusetts, when Boston Catholic Charities decided to shut down its widely praised adoption and foster care work rather than be forced to follow a state law requiring that children be placed in the homes of homosexual couples. He apparently also was referencing the fact that some Massachusetts public schools had read books about gay “marriage” to elementary-age children.

The fast-paced video criticizes Romney’s support for a federal marriage amendment. It also blasts his opposition to civil unions. It shows him saying, “I don’t favor civil unions if they’re identical to marriage other than by name.” The video claims: “Even President Bush supported civil unions.” It then shows a clip of the former president saying, “I don’t think we should deny people rights to a civil union.” 

Bush, though, did not favor civil unions. The quote at issue is from 2004, when during an interview Bush said he did not believe a federal marriage amendment—endorsed by the GOP platform—should prohibit states from legalizing civil unions. Bush’s full quote was, “I don’t think we should deny people rights to a civil union, a legal arrangement, if that’s what a state chooses to do so.” His spokespersons at the time said he did not favor such a law.

Related Coverage:

Election 2012
apriles (8/9/2012)
Obama is not worthy to hold the office of president. You cannot come out and oppose the Lord and then expect that anyone will respect you as a leader. But should we be surprised? Obama's for murdering innocent unborn Americans by the millions. He's not a man to honor the Lord, even when it comes to something as sacred as life itself. - A Schulthies, Fresno, CA

You must be login before you can leave a comment. Click here to Register if you are a new user.