You must be a registered user to access our website. Please complete the registration form at no cost, or login if you are already a registered user. Be assured, your registration information is secure and will not be sold or made available to others.
To learn why registration is now required, see this editorial on the website changes. Once you have completed the registration process, to include verification of your email address, a cookie will be placed on your computer to automatically complete the login process in the future.
Registered users, click here.
New users or if you have never registered before, click here.
OKLAHOMA CITY (BP)—Arts and crafts store Hobby Lobby apparently is willing to defy the federal government and face huge fines for not covering abortion-inducing drugs following a string of court losses in December.
Hobby Lobby’s setbacks in court at the end of the year gained significant media attention, despite the fact that for-profit businesses like the Oklahoma-based business continue to rack up court victories against the mandate. According to a tally by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, nine for-profit businesses—including three in late
December—have won injunctions in courts protecting them from the mandate. Only three for-profit businesses—Hobby Lobby among them—have failed to obtain an injunction.
Hobby Lobby is the largest business to file suit against the mandate. Its new health care plan went into effect Jan. 1.
“The company will continue to provide health insurance to all qualified employees,” said Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the Becket Fund, which is representing Hobby Lobby in court. “To remain true to their faith, it is not their intention, as a company, to pay for abortion-inducing drugs.”
A Becket spokesman Wednesday (Jan. 2) said the law firm was not commenting further on Hobby Lobby’s intentions. But if the company did choose not to cover abortion-inducing drugs mandated by the Department of Health and Human Services, it reportedly could face fines of up to $1.3 million a day.
Under the mandate, businesses and even some religious organizations are required to carry employee insurance that covers contraceptives, including emergency contraceptives such as Plan B and ella that can kill an embryo after fertilization and even after implantation. Pro-lifers consider that action a chemical abortion. After a federal judge in November ruled Hobby Lobby must cover the drugs, Becket unsuccessfully appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who oversees emergency appeals from the Tenth Circuit. Sotomayor did say the lawsuit could proceed in the lower court and be appealed back to the high court at the appropriate time.
“Hobby Lobby,” Duncan said, “will continue their appeal before the Tenth Circuit. The Supreme Court merely decided not to get involved in the case at this time. It left open the possibility of review after their appeal is completed in the Tenth Circuit.”
The Hobby Lobby suit also includes Mardel, a Christian bookstore chain. The same family—the Greens—owns both of them.
“These abortion-causing drugs go against our faith, and our family is now being forced to choose between following the laws of the land that we love or maintaining the religious beliefs that have made our business successful,” David Green, Hobby Lobby’s founder and CEO, said in September. “... We simply cannot abandon our religious beliefs to comply with this mandate.”
But elsewhere in the federal court system, for-profit businesses are winning.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2-1 decision Dec. 28 handing an Illinois-based business, Korte & Luitjohan Contractors, a victory against the abortion/contraceptive mandate. The injunction currently applies only to the business, which is owned by Catholics. The majority justices said the business owners had “established a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim” that the mandate “imposes a substantial burden on their religious exercise.” The burden in court, the justices wrote, “will be on the government” to defend the mandate. Voting in the majority were Reagan nominee Joel M. Flaum and George W. Bush nominee Diane S. Sykes. George H.W. Bush nominee Ilana Rovner dissented.
You must be login before you can leave a comment. Click here to Register if you are a new user.